Landmark judgements of article 14
Webb28 apr. 2024 · Facey 1893 UKPC 1) An invitation to offer is an opportunity given by a person eventually willing to contract to invite offers. A reply to an invitation to offer … Webb6 jan. 2024 · Present article is a dossier of some of the important landmark judgments in the discipline of constitutional law by the Supreme Court in 2024. The article attempts to …
Landmark judgements of article 14
Did you know?
Webb26 aug. 2024 · Landmark Judgements: LIC of India v. M.V. Valliapan:. In this case, the Supreme Court warned against over-emphasis on classification and... E.P. Royappa v … Webb14 maj 2024 · It is not based on any personal judgements or opinion of any individual or professional. The information from Ministry of Corporate affairs is being collated and matched to information sourced from various courts of India, Trademark authority, etc - in order to create a convenience tool for the general public at large.
WebbThe history of India Gate dates back to the early 20th century, when India was still under British colonial rule. The monument was designed by Sir Edwin Lutyens, a prominent British architect, and was built to commemorate the sacrifice of Indian soldiers who fought and died in World War I. The India Gate is a stunning example of British ... Webb25 juli 2024 · LANDMARK JUDGEMENTS ON CUSTODIAL DEATH: - Joginder Kumar v. State Of U.P and Others 1994 AIR 1349: 1994 SCC (4) 260: - The rights are inherent in Articles 21 and 22(1) of the Constitution and require to be recognised and scrupulously protected. For effective enforcement of these fundamental rights, Hon’ble Court issued …
Webb15 nov. 2007 · The Court condemned the overall unresponsiveness of the Turkish judicial system regarding domestic violence (which principally affects women) and the impunity … Webb4 feb. 2024 · The case was decided on 22 nd August 2024 by 5 judge bench – The then Chief Justice of India JS Khehar (a Sikh), and Justices Kurian Joseph (a Christian), RF Nariman (a Parsi), UU Lalit (a Hindu) and Abdul Nazeer (a Muslim) – all from distinct communities. K.S. PUTTASWAMY VS UNION OF INDIA Judge K. S. Puttaswamy …
Webbbook a useful aid. To cite an example, under chapter 14, “Arrest”, he has cited 37 landmark judgements. By reading these fourteen pages alone one can avert many a pitfall. While writing this book, the academic pursuit of the author is in full bloom, as he has drawn valuable and authenticated data from various
Webb7 mars 2024 · What are the landmark Judgements? Landmark judgements are those that set a precedent in law, or determine a major new legal principle or judicial concept or affects the interpretation of the existing law in a significant manner. Is the Supreme Court decision final in India? community\u0027s 89Webb9 apr. 2024 · By ANADI VARMA. Executive Summary. A landmark ruling in Divya Capital One (P.) Ltd. v.ACIT [2024] 445 ITR 436 (Delhi) has resulted in the concept of ‘’information’’ in the new reassessment proceedings back to being haunted by ‘’reason to believe’’.The revenue officials ,unable to comprehend and defend a fine concept which … community\u0027s 82WebbAs Courts Rule on Constitution's Basic Structure, Landmark Doctrine Turns Out to Be Elastic The 1973 'Kesavananda Bharati' case is hailed as having protected India’s democracy from sliding into... community\u0027s 84Webb9 apr. 2024 · Unni Krishnan vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, 1993 SC Supreme court held the right to education is a fundamental right, as decided in Mohini Jain Case. But in such case, Hon’ble Supreme Court fixed the age that it is a fundamental right to the children for the age of 6-14 years. community\u0027s 85Webb4 aug. 2024 · Accordingly, High Court struck down the “pre-import condition” contained in paragraph 4.14 of FTP 2015-2024 inserted vide Notification No. 33/2015-2024 dated 13.10.2024 and inserted vide clause (xii) in Notification No. 18/2015-Cus vide Notification No. 79/2024-Cus dated 13.10.2024, as being ultra vires the Advance Authorisation … community\u0027s 7zWebbArticle 14 of the Constitution, and sought adirection to provide loan waiver for all farmers irrespective of the extent of landholding The High Court allowed the writ . petition holding that the exclusion of ‘other farmers’ – those who hold land exceeding 5 acres from the land waiver scheme is discriminatory and violative – community\u0027s 81Webb31 aug. 2024 · In this Landmark Judgment, the Apex Court has applied the principal of "Commercial Wisdom" of Committee of Creditors (CoC) during Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under IBC with respect to the decision taken by the Liquidator in consultation with the Stakeholder Committee (SHC). easy welfare s.r.l